Электронная библиотека Финансового университета

     
?

Детальная информация
Карточка Таблица RUSMARC

Tromp, Coyan. Wicked philosophy: philosophy of science and vision development for complex problems / Coyan Tromp. — 1 online resource (204 pages) : illustrations — <URL:http://elib.fa.ru/ebsco/1897024.pdf>.

Дата создания записи: 03.10.2018

Тематика: Complexity (Philosophy); Science — Philosophy.; Social sciences — Philosophy.; Humanities — Philosophy.; SOCIAL SCIENCE / General.

Коллекции: EBSCO

Разрешенные действия: –

Действие 'Прочитать' будет доступно, если вы выполните вход в систему или будете работать с сайтом на компьютере в другой сети Действие 'Загрузить' будет доступно, если вы выполните вход в систему или будете работать с сайтом на компьютере в другой сети

Группа: Анонимные пользователи

Сеть: Интернет

Права на использование объекта хранения

Место доступа Группа пользователей Действие
Локальная сеть Финуниверситета Все Прочитать Печать Загрузить
Интернет Читатели Прочитать Печать
-> Интернет Анонимные пользователи

Оглавление

  • Contents
  • Preface
  • 1. Twenty-First-Century Science
    • 1.1 ‘Wicked’ Problems: The Great Challenges of Our Times
    • 1.2 The State of Modern Science
      • 1.2.1 Foundations of Modern Science
      • 1.2.2 First Foundation: Valid, Logical Inference
      • 1.2.3 Second Foundation: Empirical Observation
      • 1.2.4 The Ideal of Unified Science
      • 1.2.5 Dissent against the Orthodox Consensus
    • 1.3 The Inevitability of Philosophy
      • 1.3.1 The Münchhausen Trilemma
      • 1.3.2 Paradigm Shifts: Tipping Points or Turning Points?
      • 1.3.3 Turns in Philosophy of Science
    • 1.4 Future Avenues
      • 1.4.1 The Need for an Integrative Approach
      • 1.4.2 Complexity Thinking: A New Paradigm in Science?
  • 2. Contemporary Approaches
    • 2.1 The Traditional Standard Research Model
      • 2.1.1 The Empirical Cycle
      • 2.1.2 The Deductive-Nomological Explanatory Model
      • 2.1.3 Critical Rationalism Critically Assessed
      • 2.2 Interpretivism as an Alternative Paradigm
      • 2.2.1 The Hermeneutic Circle
      • 2.2.2 Construction and Deconstruction
      • 2.2.3 The Double Interpretation Challenge
      • 2.2.4 One-Sided Interpretation versus Reciprocal Adequacy
    • 2.3 Current Models and Future Thinking
      • 2.3.1 The Model Cycle
      • 2.3.2 Simulation as a Way to Enhance Systems and Design Thinking
      • 2.3.3 Computation and Design: New Imperialism or Emancipation of the Sciences?
    • 2.4 Unity in Diversity
  • 3. Structure and Action in Science
    • 3.1 Objective Structures or Subjective Perspectives?
      • 3.1.1 Correspondence and Representation
      • 3.1.2 Perspectivism and Fallibilism
      • 3.1.3 An Instrumental Outlook on Science
    • 3.2 A Clash of Approaches?
      • 3.2.1 There Is No Mastermind
      • 3.2.2 From Mastermind to Mapmaking
      • 3.2.3 Coherence and the Explanatory Power of Narratives
      • 3.2.4 Towards a Network Model of Correspondence and Coherence
    • 3.3 Beyond the Oppositions
      • 3.3.1 The Duality of Structure
      • 3.3.2 The Stratification of Reality: From Naive to Critical Realism
      • 3.3.3 A New Perspective: Knowledge as a Coral Reef
    • 3.4 Towards a More Dynamic View of Science
      • 3.4.1 The Action Cycle
      • 3.4.2 Design Thinking and the Policy Cycle
  • 4. Science as a Rational Process
    • 4.1 The ‘Project of Reason’
    • 4.2 Unintended and Unwanted Consequences of the Rationality Process
      • 4.2.1 Reduced and Reducing Rationality
      • 4.2.2 Fragmentation and Alienation
    • 4.3 The Societal Value of Science
      • 4.3.1 Science as a Quasi-Neutral Solution Factory
      • 4.3.2 Mode 1 and Mode 2 Knowledge
      • 4.3.3 (How) Does Science Find its Way into Society?
    • 4.4 Does Knowledge Also Imply Wisdom?
      • 4.4.1 Towards a More Sensible Continuation of the Rationalisation Process
      • 4.4.2 Slow Questions
    • 4.5 From Funnel Rationality to a More Comprehensive Rationality
  • 5. Robust Knowledge for Complex Problems
    • 5.1 Towards a Complexity-Based, Integrated Research Approach
      • 5.1.1 Methodological Implications of Complexity Thinking
      • 5.1.2 Engaging in Complexity
      • 5.1.3 Varying Regimes of Justification
    • 5.2 Science in Progress
      • 5.2.1 How to Determine the Reliability of Knowledge
      • 5.2.2 Are Different Paradigms incommensurable?
      • 5.2.3 Progressive Research Programmes and Problem Agendas
    • 5.3 Quality Criteria for Research into Complex Issues
      • 5.3.1 Objectivity Defined as Critical Intersubjectivity
      • 5.3.2 Science and Accountability
      • 5.3.3 Searching for Common Ground within Regimes of Justification
    • 5.4 Dealing with Complexity
  • 6. The Future of Science
    • 6.1 Science and Futures Thinking
      • 6.1.1 Combining Know-What with Know-How
      • 6.1.2 How to Solve the Knowledge Paradox
    • 6.2 Vision-Based Science and Science-Based Visions
      • 6.2.1 Vision with or without a Capital ‘V’?
      • 6.2.2 Virtual Realities and Possible Futures
      • 6.2.3 Visions as Forecasting Paradigm Changes
      • 6.2.4 Transformative Learning as New Educational Vision?
    • 6.3 From Funnel Vision to Comprehensive Science
      • 6.3.1 From Simple towards Reflexive Modernisation
      • 6.3.2 Towards a Super Rationality, or How to Live a Wise Life
  • References
  • Glossary and Index
  • Colophon

Статистика использования

stat Количество обращений: 0
За последние 30 дней: 0
Подробная статистика