Электронная библиотека Финансового университета

     
?

Детальная информация
Карточка Таблица RUSMARC

Amel, Rodica. Doxastic Dialectics / by Rodica Amel. — 1 online resource. — <URL:http://elib.fa.ru/ebsco/2183684.pdf>.

Дата создания записи: 08.07.2019

Тематика: Dialectology.; Language and languages — Philosophy.

Коллекции: EBSCO

Разрешенные действия: –

Действие 'Прочитать' будет доступно, если вы выполните вход в систему или будете работать с сайтом на компьютере в другой сети Действие 'Загрузить' будет доступно, если вы выполните вход в систему или будете работать с сайтом на компьютере в другой сети

Группа: Анонимные пользователи

Сеть: Интернет

Права на использование объекта хранения

Место доступа Группа пользователей Действие
Локальная сеть Финуниверситета Все Прочитать Печать Загрузить
Интернет Читатели Прочитать Печать
-> Интернет Анонимные пользователи

Оглавление

  • Table of Contents
  • Foreword
  • Acknowledgements
  • Part I: Pragmatics – General Considerations
    • Introduction
    • Chapter One
      • 1.1. Pragmatics – definitions
        • 1.1.1. Scientific paradigm
        • 1.1.2. The paradigmatic extension of pragmatics
      • 1.2. Pragmatic concepts susceptible to reinterpretation
        • 1.2.1. Negotiation
        • 1.2.2. Metalanguage and metadialogue
        • 1.2.3. The negotiable dynamics of the metadialogue
        • 1.2.4. When MEANINGS are NEGOTIATED
        • 1.2.5. Cognitive intentionality
        • 1.2.6. Conceptual procedure
      • 1.3. Conclusion
      • Notes
    • Chapter Two
      • 2.1. Theoretical target
        • 2.1.1. The basic theme
        • 2.1.2. New concepts
      • 2.2. The concept of subjectivity
        • 2.2.1. A complex and disputed problem
        • 2.2.2. Beyond pragmatics
      • 2.3. Discursive subject and discursive dynamics
      • 2.4. Referentiality – self-referentiality
        • 2.4.1. Self-referentiality and the history of the concept
        • 2.4.2. The deconstructive role of the subject
      • 2.5. Energeia or the dynamic potential of the subject
        • 2.5.1. Forma mentis
        • 2.5.2. The crisis of grounding principles
      • 2.6. Pragmatics and the concept of consciousness
      • 2.7. Conclusions regarding subjectivity in language
    • Chapter Three
      • 3.1. About the argument
        • 3.1.1. Polysemy of the concept of argument
        • 3.1.2. Aristotle’s classifi
      • 3.2. About dialectics
        • 3.2.1. Etymology
        • 3.2.2. What does reflexive feature of argumentation mean?
        • 3.2.3. What does ‘argumentative dialectics’ mean?
      • 3.3. Horizon of interrogation
        • 3.3.1. Informative questions do not trigger argumentative inquiry
        • 3.3.2. Interrogation vs. problematisation
        • 3.3.3. Interrogation vs. doubt/uncertainty/indecidability
      • 3.4. Argumentation and cognition
      • 3.5. Conclusions
      • Notes
    • Chapter Four
      • 4.1. A: Adapting the thinking to things
        • 4.1.1. What does ‘rationality of things’ mean?
        • 4.1.2. What does language rationality mean?
        • 4.1.3. What does adequacy of the mind to reality mean?
      • 4.2. Various interpretations
      • 4.3. The law/rule of rationality
      • 4.4. The scepticism
        • 4.4.1. Argumentation – argument
        • 4.4.2. Judging arguments
      • 4.5. Conclusions
      • 4.6. B: Adapting the intellect to argument
        • 4.6.1. Logic of controversy – antithetic logic
        • 4.6.2. The logic of controversy – principle of rationality governed by antithetic logic
        • 4.6.3. The logic of controversy – the principle of reciprocity
        • 4.6.4. The constitutive rule of episteme, starting from doxa
        • 4.6.5. The argumentative way of epistemic constitution
        • 4.6.6. The dialectical argumentation
      • 4.7. C: Adapting the intellect to common places
        • 4.7.1. What does common places mean?
        • 4.7.2. Enthymeme
        • 4.7.3. General remarks
      • 4.8. Conclusion
      • Notes
  • Part II: Doxastic Dialectics
    • Introduction
    • Chapter Five
      • 5.1. Traditional doctrine
      • 5.2. Billig’s book
      • 5.3. Doxastic dialectics evinces three cognitive functions
        • 5.3.1. The dissociative function of the doxastic dialectics
        • 5.3.2. The justificatory mechanism of the doxastic dialectics
        • 5.3.3. The constitutive function of the doxastic dialectics
      • 5.4. Doxastic subjectivity and the changed idea of rationality
      • 5.5. Instead of conclusions
      • Notes
    • Chapter Six
      • 6.1. Preliminary considerations
      • 6.2. The progression of a quarrel on the seven causes
        • 6.2.1. A coherent contradiction
        • 6.2.2. Conflict versus contradiction
      • 6.3. De gustibus non disputandum
        • 6.3.1. A taste judgement
        • 6.3.2. The Shakespearean ‘model’
      • 6.4. Conclusions
        • 6.4.l. The theoretical model
        • 6.4.2. About the negotiation steps
      • Notes
    • Chapter Seven
      • 7.1. Preliminary remarks
        • 7.1.1. A cultural construct
        • 7.1.2. The Kantian critique
      • 7.2. Some possible definitions of prejudice
        • 7.2.1. The common intuition
        • 7.2.2. Prejudice and prejudgement
        • 7.2.3. Prejudice and presuppositions
      • 7.3. Prejudgement vs. Prejudice
        • 7.3.1. The corrupted nature of prejudgements/prejudices
        • 7.3.2. Critical examination
      • 7.4. How can we explain the ‘power of prejudices’?
      • Notes
    • Chapter Eight
      • 8.1. The issue
      • 8.2. Basic concepts
        • 8.2.1. Theoretical limitation
        • 8.2.2. Field limitation
      • 8.3. Conceptual vulnerabilities
        • 8.3.1. Theoretical argument
        • 8.3.2. Linguistic argument
        • 8.3.3. Aesthetic argument
        • 8.3.4. Theoretical paradigm
      • 8.4. Conclusions
      • Notes
    • Chapter Nine
      • 9.1. Between psychology and (argumentative) logic
        • 9.1.1. Dissuasion vs. persuasion
        • 9.1.2. Rhetorical involvement
      • 9.2. The crisis of the justification device
        • 9.2.1. Cultural axioms
        • 9.2.2. The gap of the creative mind
      • 9.3. Critical strategy
        • 9.3.1. Critical shortcoming
        • 9.3.2. Axiological doubt
      • 9.4. Conclusion
      • Notes
    • Chapter Ten
      • 10.1. Two problems
      • 10.2. Definitional retreat
      • 10.3. Dialogue as a societal game
        • 10.3.1. Theory of roles and the dialogical voices
        • 10.3.2. In for a penny, in for a pound
        • 10.3.3. The discursive identity
      • 10.4. How is a speaker’s image constituted?
        • 10.4.1. The strategy of taking turns
        • 10.4.2. Who is the interlocutor?
        • 10.4.3. I and the other vs. I and myself
        • 10.4.4. The non-saturated measure of identity
      • 10.5. Conclusion
      • Notes
    • Chapter Eleven
      • 11.1. Premises
      • 11.2. Doxastic dialectics and loci communes
      • 11.3. Doxastic dialectics and the cognitive process
        • 11.3.1. Doxastic field – a dynamic image
        • 11.3.2. Paradigmatic anomaly: The riddle of Judaism
        • 11.3.3. Paradigmatic break (paradigm refutation)
        • 11.3.4. Paradigmatic crisis
      • 11.4. Conclusion
      • Notes
    • Chapter Twelve
      • 12.1. Preliminary assignments
      • 12.2. Philosophical target and theoretical means
      • 12.3. The principle of opposition
        • 12.3.1. The grounding role of an alternative subjectivity
        • 12.3.2. Intercultural field and hermeneutics
      • 12.4. ‘La conquête de l’horizon d’interpretation par fusion d’horizons.’
        • 12.4.1. The existential meaning is not yet a measure
        • 12.4.2. Common ideas
      • 12.5. Conclusions
      • Notes
    • Chapter Thirteen
      • 13.1. The call of principium
      • 13.2. Intelligible inherence
      • 13.3. Original proof
        • 13.3.1. Meaning has no ontological support
        • 13.3.2. Protodoxa
        • 13.3.3. A reference system is a matter of interpretation
        • 13.3.4. Hermeneutical logic
      • 13.4. Conclusion
      • Notes
    • Chapter Fourteen
      • 14.1. Preliminary explanations
      • 14.2. The principle of individuation
      • 14.3. Totality – the closed universe
        • 14.3.1. Place as a physical index vs. place as a human symbol
        • 14.3.2. The concept of metaphysical transubstantiation
      • 14.4. Infinity – the open universe
        • 14.4.1. Profane dimension/sense of the place vs. sacred dimension /sense of the place
        • 14.4.2. Makom vs. Hamakom
      • 14.5. Conclusion
      • Notes
    • Chapter Fifteen
      • 15.1. Points of view
        • 15.1.1. Common reader’s receptivity
        • 15.1.2. A book of confession
        • 15.1.3. A pragmatic and beyond point of view
      • 15.2. Pragmatic inquiry
        • 15.2.1. Game parameters
        • 15.2.2. The author’s/speaker’s discursive strategy
        • 15.2.3. The author’s/speaker’s referential strategy
        • 15.2.4. Comprehensive image of Israeli reality
        • 15.2.5. ‘Le tour de la chose’
      • 15.3. Hermeneutical inquiry
        • 15.3.1. The speaker’s own image
        • 15.3.2. The reader’s interpretation of the speaker’s meaning
      • 15.4. Instead of conclusions
      • Notes
    • Chapter Sixteen
      • 16.1. General remarks
      • 16.2. Beliefs’ structure of forces
        • 16.2.1. Belief as a speech act
        • 16.2.2. Dialectical proofs within doxastic
      • 16.3. Metaphysical transubstantiation
        • 16.3.1. Grice’s argument
        • 16.3.2. The two levels of metaphysical transubstantiation
      • 16.4. Conclusions
        • 16.4.1. Belief as a reason to adopt a certain attitude (social or metaphysical)
        • 16.4.2. To read the world and to understand it
      • Notes
    • Chapter Seventeen
      • 17.1. Introductory explanation
        • 17.1.1. About petitio principii
        • 17.1.2. About paradox
        • 17.1.3. About doxastic dialectics
      • 17.2. About doxastic subjectivity
        • 17.2.1. Belief vs. doxa vs. opinion
        • 17.2.2. Different approaches to subjectivity
        • 17.2.3. Moral subjectivity
      • 17.4. Petitio principii structure of doxastic dialectics
        • 17.4.1. Doxastic rationality
        • 17.4.2. The goal of the present study
        • 17.4.3. Subjectivity as an original proof
        • 17.4.4. Subjectivity in the search of language
      • 17.5. Conclusions
      • Notes
    • Afterword
  • Annexes
    • 1. Axiomatisation of Science
    • 2. Organon
      • FORCE
      • FUNCTIONS
      • (Conversational) MAXIMs
      • MODEL
      • PRINCIPLE
      • STRUCTURE
      • THEORY
  • Selective Bibliography
  • Index

Статистика использования

stat Количество обращений: 0
За последние 30 дней: 0
Подробная статистика