This book presents interdisciplinary research carried out on the Roman sites of pottery workshops active within the coastal area of the province of Dalmatia as well as on material recovered during the excavations.

• Cover
• Copyright Page
• Contents Page
• List of Figures
• List of the Authors
• Preface
  • Goranka Lipovac Vrkljan and Ana Konestra
• Eastern Adriatic Hellenistic and Roman pottery and ceramics production sites
  • Goranka Lipovac Vrkljan, Ana Konestra and Marina Ugarković
• G. Lipovac Vrkljan et al.: Eastern Adriatic Hellenistic and Roman pottery and ceramics production sites
  • Figure 1. Map of Eastern Adriatic Hellenistic and Roman pottery and ceramics production sites.
• M.-B. Carre and S. Pesavento Mattioli: The amphorae of the western Adriatic: an update
  • Figure 1. Fourth-phase Dressel 6B amphora with the stamp C.P.M. (palma) (Gaddi and Maggi 2017: 302, fig. 75).
  • Figure 2. Funnel-shaped rim amphora stamped C.IVLI/MARCELLI (Gaddi and Maggi 2017: 312, fig. 88).
  • Figure 3. Lamboglia 2 amphora from Matelica (Macerata) (Paci 2016: 541, figs 1-2).
  • Figure 4. Stamp of the freedman L. Gavius Licinus (Curina, Mongardi forthcoming).
  • Figure 5. Small fish-sauce Adriatic amphora bearing the painted inscription LIQ(uamen)/ AQVIL(eiense)/ XVIII (Gaddi and Maggi 2017: 323, fig. 105).
• The amphorae of the western Adriatic: an update
  • Marie-Brigitte Carre and Stefania Pesavento Mattioli
• Approaching the Roman economy of Province Dalmatia through pottery production – the Liburnia case study
  • Goranka Lipovac Vrkljan and Ana Konestra
• G. Lipovac Vrkljan and A. Konestra: Approaching the Roman economy of Province Dalmatia
  • Figure 1. Crikvenica – excavated pottery kilns.
  • Figure 2. Mahućina Bay, Lopar – Rab island – kiln locations.
  • Figure 4. Plemići Bay, Rtina, Ražanac – location of site.
  • Figure 5. Plemići Bay, Rtina, Ražanac: 1) fragments of kiln and over-fired ceramics within the eroded profiles; 2) wasters within the eroded profiles; 3) remains of architecture visible on the beach; 4) lump of wasters.
  • Table 1. Tile-stamps of certain and possible Dalmatian workshops (coastal area).
• I. Ožanić Roguljić: Overview of the Capacity of Pottery Vessels
  • Figure 1. Fabrics (photo: I. Ožanić Roguljić).
  • Figure 2. Tableware (photo/drawing: Miljenko Gregl).
  • Figure 4. Jug (photo/drawing: Miljenko Gregl).
  • Figure 5. Pots with two handles (photo/drawing: Miljenko Gregl).
  • Figure 6. Pots (photo/drawing: Miljenko Gregl).
• Overview of the Capacity of Pottery Vessels from the Workshop of Sextus Metillius Maximus (Crikvenica)
  • Ivana Ožanić Roguljić
• M. Ilkić: Numismatic finds from the area of the workshop of Sextus Metilius Maximus
  • Figure 1. Crikvenica – numismatic finds within the pottery workshop (author: M. Ilkić)
  • Figure 2. Numismatic finds from the Liburnian area (author: M. Ilkić).
• Numismatic finds from the area of the workshop of Sextus Metilius Maximus in Crikvenica
  • Mato Ilkić
• I. Borzić et al.: New finds of Crikvenica 1-type amphorae in the area of southern Liburnia
  • Figure 1. Map of southern Liburnia with finds of Crikvenica products (author: I. Borzić).
  • Figure 2. Nadin hillforts with Area B indicated (photos: M. Grgurić, V. Glavaš).
  • Figure 3. Crikvenica type-1 amphorae sherds from Nadin (drawings: Z. Bakić; photo: I. Borzić).
  • Figure 4. Asseria hillfort, sector A2 and fragment of Crikvenica type-1 amphorae handle (photos: M. Gospić; G. Lipovac Vrkljan).
  • Figure 5. Starigrad-Paklenica (Argyruntum) showing the position of the 2018 excavations (photo: M. Grgurić; basemap: geoportal.dgu.hr).
  • Figure 6. Crikvenica type-1 amphorae sherds from Starigrad-Paklenica (Argyrunutm) (photos: I. Borzić).
• New finds of Crikvenica 1-type amphorae in the area of southern Liburnia
  • Igor Borzić, Martina Čelhar, Gregory Zaro and Vedrana Glavaš
• Crikvenica amphorae from Canale Anfora: first evidence of Liburnian wine at Aquileia
  • Paola Maggi
• P. Maggi: Crikvenica amphorae from Canale Anfora: first evidence of Liburnian wine at Aquileia
  • Figure 1. Aquileia: current course of the Anfora channel close to the city (from Fozzati (ed) 2010: 47).
  • Figure 2. Aquileia: reconstruction of the waterways network to the west of the city on the bases of geophysical survey conducted in 2011, with the extension of the course of Anfora channel between the River Terzo and the urban perimeter, and its connectio
  • Figure 3. Aquileia – Anfora channel, location of the channel’s sections investigated in 1988 and 2004-2005 (reworked on the bases of Gaddi 2017: 21, fig. 1).
  • Figure 4. Aquileia – Anfora channel, Crikvenica type 1 amphora from the 1988 excavation.
  • Figure 5. Aquileia – Anfora channel, rim of the Crikvenica type 1 amphora from the 2004-2005 excavations (drawing by Silvia Tinazzo).
• F. Welc: Geoarchaeology of pottery workshop sites in Roman Dalmatia
  • Figure 1. Geophysical survey polygons within Podšilo Bay, Lopar, island of Rab (basemap: DGU).
  • Figure 2. Geophysical survey polygons within Plemići Bay, Ražanac Municipality (basemap: DGU).
  • Figure 3. Podšilo – Podkućine, Lopar: a) Magnetic and GPR results; b) 3D model of the obtained results.
  • Figure 4. a) map of the magnetic anomalies in Podšilo Bay, Po. 5, interpreted as the remains of a kiln; b) kiln excavated in 2009.
  • Figure 5. Crikvenice – GPR and Magnetic plans, indicating: 1) the area of anomalies possibly generated by remains of kilns; and 2) the area of anomalies of more difficult interpretation (Welc et al. 2017b: fig. 8).
  • Figure 6. GPR time slice for approximate depth of 1 m overlapped with the plan of the visible architecture in Plemići bay.
• Geoarchaeology of pottery workshop sites in Roman Dalmatia
  • Fabian Welc
• Harbour installations in the context of the pottery workshop in Plemići Bay
  • Mate Parica and Mato Ilkić
• M. Parica and M. Ilkić: Harbour installations in the context of the pottery workshop in Plemići Bay
  • Figure 1. Underwater research at the smaller pier (photo: M. Parica).
  • Figure 3. Satellite image of Plemići Bay showing the two piers (source: Arkod).
  • Figure 4. Drawing of the larger pier showing the recorded depths (drawing: M. Parica).
  • Figure 5. Stone embankment of the larger pier (photo: M. Parica).
  • Figure 6. Fragment of a tegula on the stone embankment of the pier (photo: M. Parica).
  • Figure 7. Fragment of wooden post within the structure of the stone embankment of the pier (photo: M. Parica).
• Anthracology and wood analysis from the pottery workshop sites of Crikvenica – Igralište and Plemići Bay: first results of genus identification
  • Ernest Goršić
• E. Goršić: Anthracology and wood analysis from the pottery workshop sites of Crikvenica
  • Figure 1. a) The archaeological remains of burnt wood from layer SU 219; b) detail (photo: B. Šiljeg).
  • Table 1. Charcoal and wood samples with findspost and genus.
• Animal exploitation at the Roman site of Crikvenica – Igralište
  • Kazimir Miculinić
• K. Miculinić: Animal exploitation at the Roman site of Crikvenica – Igralište
  • Figure 1. Wild boar canine with corroded enamel (photo: K. Miculinić).
  • Figure 2. Cut marks on cattle humerus; distal cut on badger ulna; burned bones (photo: K. Miculinić).
  • Figure 3. Cattle ulna with cut articulation and smoothed distal part (photo: K. Miculinić).
  • Figure 4. Bone tool (photo: K. Miculinić).
  • Figure 5. Bone tools (photo: K. Miculinić).
  • Table 1. Domestic animals (author: K. Miculinić).
  • Table 2. Wild animals (author: K. Miculinić).
• M. Ugarković and B. Šegvić: The role of archaeometry in the study of production
  • Figure 1. Maps of central Dalmatia, with indicated relevant sites (author: M. Ugarković).
  • Figure 2. Drawings of selected ceramic shapes: plate with horizontally articulated rim (1); plate with vertical rim (2); plate with rouletting decoration (3); relief mould-made bowls (4, 5); skyphos/kantharos (6); thorn kantharos (7); kantharos (8); art
  • Table 1. List of archaeological samples, with details and corresponding numbers (author: M. Ugarković).
  • Table 2. List of all samples with their chemistry (author: M. Ugarković).
• The role of archaeometry in the study of production and dispersal of Hellenistic pottery in Dalmatia, with new evidence on the chemistry of grey-ware tableware
  • Marina Ugarković and Branimir Šegvić
• Archaeometric characterisation of pottery and ceramics from Dalmatian Roman pottery workshops and possible clay raw material by multivariate statistical analysis
  • Tea Zubin Ferri
• T. Zubin Ferri: Archaeometric characterisation of pottery and ceramics from Dalmatian Roman pottery
  • Table 1. Description of potsherd and clay samples (author: T. Zubin Ferri).
• A. Grizelj: Mineralogical analyses of Roman pottery from Dalmatian workshops
  • Figure 1. Selected samples (a. Mahućina tegula, N-17, sherd; b. Plemići amphora, PL-1, sherd; c. Podšilo1 tegula, Podšilo 2 tegula, sherds; d. Crikvenica spica – overfired, U-396; e. Aquileia amphora 2.1, Aquileia amphora 2.2, Aquileia amphora 2.3, sher
  • Table 1. Semiquantitative content of bulk samples and clay minerals in the <2 μm fraction obtained by XRD (author: A. Grizelj).
  • Table 3. Semiquantitative content of pottery samples obtained by XRD (author: A. Grizelj).
• Mineralogical analyses of Roman pottery from Dalmatian workshops and potential clays sources
  • Anita Grizelj
• N. Šegvić: RED Spatial Database
  • Figure 1. RED database sheme (author: N. Šegvić).
  • Figure 2. RED QGIS interface example (image: N. Šegvić).
  • Figure 3. RED web database search home page (image: N. Šegvić).
  • Figure 4. RED web map (image: N. Šegvić).
• RED Spatial Database
  • Nera Šegvić
• Back cover