Card | Table | RUSMARC | |
Annotation
The question of characterizing academic vocabulary has often been framed in a context that is purely determined by questions of language teaching. The aim in such approaches is to come up with a list of words for learners of English for Special Purposes. This book approaches this question from a more general, empirical perspective, focusing on medical vocabulary. Its main contention is that the characterization of medical vocabulary is much more complex than is suggested by a simple list. In a list, a threshold determines the borderline on a one-dimensional scale between what counts as medical.
Document access rights
Network | User group | Action | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finuniversity Local Network | All | |||||
Internet | Readers | |||||
Internet | Anonymous |
Table of Contents
- Table of Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter One
- Chapter Two
- 2.1 Defining specialized vocabulary
- 2.2 Three methods for delimiting specialized vocabulary
- 2.3 Coxhead’s Academic Word List
- 2.4 The Medical Academic Word List by Wang, Liang and Ge (2008)
- 2.5 A New Academic Word List by Gardner and Davies (2013)
- Chapter Three
- 3.1 The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)
- 3.2 The medical subcorpus in COCA
- 3.3 ACAD
- 3.4 Conclusion
- Chapter Four
- 4.1 Methodology of an illustrative medical corpus design
- 4.2 Distribution of nouns in WIMECO
- 4.3 Distribution of verbs, adjectives, and adverbs in WIMECO
- 4.4 How useful are the two medical corpora?
- Conclusion
- Appendix 1
- Appendix 2
- Appendix 3
- Bibliography
- Author Index
- Subject Index
Usage statistics
Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0 Detailed usage statistics |