Card | Table | RUSMARC | |
Crible, Ludivine. Discourse markers and (dis)fluency: forms and functions across languages and registers / Ludivine Crible. — 1 online resource. — (Pragmatics & Beyond new series(P&BNS). — <URL:http://elib.fa.ru/ebsco/1708701.pdf>.Record create date: 1/4/2018 Subject: Discourse markers.; Pragmatics.; Language and languages — Study and teaching — Foreign speakers.; Fluency (Language learning); Functional discourse grammar.; Contrastive lingusitics.; Functionalism (Linguistics); LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General Collections: EBSCO Allowed Actions: –
Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Group: Anonymous Network: Internet |
Document access rights
Network | User group | Action | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finuniversity Local Network | All | |||||
Internet | Readers | |||||
Internet | Anonymous |
Table of Contents
- Discourse Markers and (Dis)fluency
- Editorial page
- Title page
- LCC data
- Table of contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of abbreviations and acronyms
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1. Introduction
- 1.1 Fluency in time and space
- 1.2 Background and objectives
- 1.3 Preview of the book
- Chapter 2. Definitions and corpus-based approaches to fluency and disfluency
- 2.1 Disfluency or repair? Levelt’s legacy
- 2.2 Holistic definitions of fluency
- 2.3 Componential approaches to fluency and disfluency
- 2.3.1 Qualitative components of perception
- 2.3.2 Quantitative components of production
- 2.3.2.1 Disfluencies as removable errors
- 2.3.2.2 The functional ambivalence of disfluencies
- 2.3.3 Götz’s qualitative-quantitative approach
- 2.4 Synthesis: Definition adopted in this work
- 2.5 A usage-based account of (dis)fluency
- 2.5.1 Key notions in usage-based linguistics
- 2.5.2 From schemas to sequences of fluencemes
- 2.5.3 Variation in context(s)
- 2.5.4 Accessing fluency through frequency
- 2.6 Summary and hypotheses
- Chapter 3. Definitions and corpus-based approaches to discourse markers
- 3.1 From connectives to pragmatic markers: Defining the continuum
- 3.2 Discourse markers in contrastive linguistics
- 3.3 Models of discourse marker functions
- 3.3.1 Discourse relations in the Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0
- 3.3.2 The many scopes of DM functions
- 3.3.2.1 Long-distance relations
- 3.3.2.2 Co-occurrence of discourse markers
- 3.3.2.3 Utterance-final discourse markers
- 3.3.2.4 Speech-based models and present taxonomy
- 3.4 “Fluent” vs. “disfluent” discourse markers
- 3.4.1 DM features and (dis)fluency
- 3.4.2 Previous corpus-based accounts of DMs and disfluency
- 3.4.2.1 Exclusions based on DM multifunctionality
- 3.4.2.2 Exclusions for methodological validity
- 3.4.2.3 Treatment of DMs and disfluencies as distinct categories
- 3.5 Summary and hypotheses
- Chapter 4. Corpus and method
- 4.1 The DisFrEn dataset
- 4.1.1 Source corpora
- 4.1.2 Comparable corpus design
- 4.1.3 Corpus structure in situational features
- 4.2 Discourse marker annotation
- 4.2.1 Identification of DM tokens
- 4.2.2 Functional taxonomy
- 4.2.3 Three-fold positioning system
- 4.2.4 Other variables
- 4.2.5 Annotation procedure
- 4.2.5.1 Software
- 4.2.5.2 Disambiguation method
- 4.3 Disfluency annotation
- 4.3.1 Simple fluencemes
- 4.3.1.1 Silent pauses
- 4.3.1.2 Filled pauses
- 4.3.1.3 Explicit editing terms
- 4.3.1.4 False-starts
- 4.3.1.5 Truncations
- 4.3.2 Compound fluencemes
- 4.3.2.1 Identical repetitions
- 4.3.2.2 Modified repetitions
- 4.3.2.3 Morphosyntactic substitutions
- 4.3.2.4 Propositional substitutions
- 4.3.3 Related phenomena and diacritics
- 4.3.4 Annotation procedure
- 4.3.4.1 Technical format
- 4.3.4.2 Scope of the disfluency annotation
- 4.3.4.3 Replicability of the disfluency annotation
- 4.3.5 Macro-labels of sequences
- 4.3.1 Simple fluencemes
- 4.4 Summary
- 4.1 The DisFrEn dataset
- Chapter 5. Portraying the category of discourse markers
- 5.1 Distribution across languages and registers
- 5.1.1 General frequency
- 5.1.2 The status of tag questions
- 5.1.3 Register variation
- 5.1.4 A greater effect of register over language?
- 5.1.5 DM expressions in contrast
- 5.1.6 Diversity hypothesis
- 5.2 Position of DMs: Initiality in question
- 5.2.1 Clause-initial DMs
- 5.2.2 Utterance-initial DMs
- 5.2.3 Turn-initial DMs
- 5.2.4 Non-initial DMs
- 5.2.4.1 Typical patterns
- 5.2.4.2 Utterance-final DMs: Formal variation
- 5.2.4.3 Clause-medial DMs: Potential disfluency?
- 5.2.4.4 The case of hedges
- 5.2.5 Interim summary on position
- 5.3 Domains and functions: Frequency and diversity
- 5.3.1 Single domains
- 5.3.1.1 Domain across languages
- 5.3.1.2 Domains across registers
- 5.3.1.3 Domain-specific DMs
- 5.3.2 Single functions
- 5.3.2.1 Functions across languages
- 5.3.2.2 Functions across registers
- 5.3.2.3 Functional diversity
- 5.3.3 Double domains and functions
- 5.3.1 Single domains
- 5.4 Integrating syntax and pragmatics
- 5.5 Co-occurrence of DMs
- 5.5.1 Co-occurrence across languages and registers
- 5.5.2 Co-occurrence across positions
- 5.5.3 Integrated statistical model of co-occurrence
- 5.6 Summary
- 5.7 Interim discussion: The potential of bottom-up research
- 5.1 Distribution across languages and registers
- Chapter 6. Disfluency in interviews
- 6.1 Data
- 6.2 Fluenceme rates in English and French
- 6.2.1 Number of tags
- 6.2.2 Number of tokens
- 6.2.3 Radio vs. face-to-face interviews
- 6.3 Clustering tendencies
- 6.3.1 Isolation vs. combination
- 6.3.2 Most frequent clusters
- 6.3.3 DMs in clusters
- 6.4 Fluency as frequency
- 6.4.1 Frequency and structural complexity
- 6.4.2 Frequency and sequence length
- 6.5 Summary
- Chapter 7. The (dis)fluency of discourse markers
- 7.1 Sequence types across registers
- 7.1.1 “Cluster”
- 7.1.2 “Sequence category”
- 7.1.3 “Internal structure”
- 7.1.4 Sequence-specific DMs
- 7.2 Sequence types across DM features
- 7.2.1 Disfluency and functional domain
- 7.2.2 Disfluency, domain and position
- 7.2.3 Synthesis of variables
- 7.3 Potentially Disfluent Functions
- 7.3.1 PDFs across registers
- 7.3.2 PDFs and sequence types
- 7.3.3 PDFs and sequence structure
- 7.4 Summary
- 7.5 Interim discussion: The “silence” of corpora
- 7.1 Sequence types across registers
- Chapter 8. Discourse markers in repairs
- 8.1 Previous approaches to repair
- 8.1.1 Reformulation and its markers: The French classics
- 8.1.1.1 Charolles & Coltier
- 8.1.1.2 Gülich & Kotschi
- 8.1.1.3 De Gaulmyn
- 8.1.2 Contrastive perspectives on reformulation markers
- 8.1.2.1 Rossari
- 8.1.2.2 Murillo
- 8.1.2.3 Cuenca and Ciabarri
- 8.1.2.4 Auer & Pfänder
- 8.1.3 From reformulation to repair: Levelt’s (1983) typology of repair
- 8.1.4 Research questions and hypotheses
- 8.1.1 Reformulation and its markers: The French classics
- 8.2 Data and method
- 8.2.1 Selection criteria
- 8.2.2 Repair category
- 8.2.3 Relation to annotated fluencemes
- 8.2.4 Intra-annotator agreement
- 8.3 Repair categories across languages
- 8.4 DMs in repairs
- 8.4.1 Position of the DMs
- 8.4.2 DM lexemes
- 8.4.3 Potentially Disfluent Functions in repairs
- 8.4.4 Specification and enumeration
- 8.5 DMs and modified repetitions
- 8.6 Summary
- 8.7 Interim discussion: Low quantity, high quality?
- 8.1 Previous approaches to repair
- Chapter 9. Conclusion
- 9.1 Summary of the main findings
- 9.2 General discussion
- 9.3 Implications and research avenues
- Bibliography
- Appendix 1. Discourse markers by register
- Appendix 2. List of discourse markers in DisFrEn and their functions
- Appendix 3. List of functions in DisFrEn and their discourse markers
- Acknowledgments
- Appendix 4. Top-five most frequent functions by register in DisFrEn
- Index
Usage statistics
Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0 Detailed usage statistics |