Card | Table | RUSMARC | |
Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony / edited by Sonia Cristofaro, Fernando Zuniga. — 1 online resource. — (Typological Studies in Language(TSL). — <URL:http://elib.fa.ru/ebsco/1844285.pdf>.Record create date: 1/4/2018 Subject: Typology (Linguistics); Historical linguistics.; Linguistic universals.; Anthropological linguistics.; Anthropological linguistics.; Historical linguistics.; Linguistic universals.; Typology (Linguistics); LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Historical & Comparative Collections: EBSCO Allowed Actions: –
Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Group: Anonymous Network: Internet |
Document access rights
Network | User group | Action | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finuniversity Local Network | All | |||||
Internet | Readers | |||||
Internet | Anonymous |
Table of Contents
- Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
- Editorial page
- Title page
- LCC data
- Table of contents
- Synchronic vs. diachronic approaches to typological hierarchies
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Typological hierarchies: Some traditional explanations and open issues
- 3. Synchronic distributional patterns and their diachronic sources
- 4. Multiple diachronic origins
- 5. Accounting for exceptions
- 6. Concluding remarks: Diachronic vs. synchronic explanations of typological hierarchies
- References
- Evolutionary Phonology and the life cycle of voiceless consonants
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Voiceless sonorants as contrastive segment types
- 3. Historical sources of voiceless sonorants
- 3.1 Voiceless sonorants via RH, HR coarticulation
- 3.2 Voiceless sonorants via phrase-final devoicing
- 4. Structural factors in the maintenance of voiceless vowels
- 4.1 The role of analogy
- 4.2 The role of /h/
- 4.3 Phonotactics and morphotactics
- 4.4 Lexical competition
- 5. Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgments
- References
- The Obligatory Coding Principle in diachronic perspective
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Some terminological clarifications
- 2.1 Transitivity
- 2.2 Variation in the construction of transitive verbs and basic transitive coding
- 2.3 Core arguments vs. obliques
- 2.4 Alignment
- 2.5 Zero case
- 2.6 Ergative case, ergative alignment, ergative languages
- 3. The Obligatory Coding Principle
- 4. Markedness reversals between the transitive construction and its variants
- 4.1 Introductory remarks
- 4.2 Shift from obligatory A coding to obligatory P coding resulting from the reanalysis of a passive construction as the basic transitive construction
- 4.3 Shift from obligatory P coding to obligatory A coding resulting from the reanalysis of an antipassive construction as the basic transitive construction
- 5. The grammaticalization of TAM and the Obligatory Coding Principle
- 5.1 Introductory remarks
- 5.2 Reanalysis of a resultative construction as a perfect and split-alignment
- 5.3 Split-alignment resulting from the grammaticalization of a new perfect form: Problems in reconstructing the scenario
- 5.4 Progressive periphrases and split alignment
- 5.5 Uncommon split alignment patterns, and the TAM periphrases of Basque
- 5.6 Concluding remarks
- 6. Conventionalization of argument ellipsis and the Obligatory Coding Principle
- 6.1 Introductory remarks
- 6.2 Conventionalization of P ellipsis in obligatory P coding languages: An illustration from Akhvakh
- 6.3 Conventionalization of A ellipsis in obligatory A coding languages: Illustrations from Amharic and Russian
- 7. Univerbation of light verb compounds and the Obligatory Coding Principle
- 8. Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- References
- Deconstruction teleology
- 1. The hierarchies
- 2. Number
- 2.1 Number developments in Iroquoian
- 2.2 Stimulus
- 3. Head marking
- 4. Alignment splits
- 4.1 Reanalysis of instruments
- 4.2 Reanalysis of passives
- 5. Hierarchies as constraints on change?
- 6. Conclusion
- References
- The development of referential hierarchy effects in Sahaptian
- 1. Introduction: The Sahaptian language family and its hierarchical patterns
- 2. Previously described hierarchies in Sahaptin
- 2.1 Hierarchical patterns in Sahaptin
- 2.1.1 Intransitive clauses
- 2.1.2 Mixed direct quadrant
- 2.1.3 Local quadrant
- 2.1.4 Mixed inverse quadrant
- 2.1.5 Nonlocal quadrant
- 2.2 Aligning the morphemes and constructions
- 2.2.1 Coding arguments: Morphology
- 2.2.2 Coding arguments: Constructions
- 2.1 Hierarchical patterns in Sahaptin
- 3. Reconstructing hierarchical morphology to Proto-Sahaptian
- 3.1 Enclitics
- 3.2 Verbal indexation
- 3.3 Case marking
- 4. Reconstructing the main clause constructions of Proto-Sahaptian
- 4.1 Reconstructing the Proto-Sahaptian direct, local, and inverse quadrants
- 4.1.1 Enclitics
- 4.1.2 Verbal prefixes
- 4.1.3 Case markers
- 4.2 Reconstructing the Proto-Sahaptian nonlocal quadrant
- 4.2.1 The *nonlocal direct construction
- 4.2.2 The *3pl.a direct and *3pl.o inverse constructions
- 4.2.3 The *nonlocal inverse construction
- 4.2.4 Summary of nonlocal constructions
- 4.1 Reconstructing the Proto-Sahaptian direct, local, and inverse quadrants
- 5. Discussion: The sources of hierarchical patterns in the Sahaptian family
- 5.1 Pronouns and verbal indexation
- 5.2 Case marking
- 5.3 Passive to inverse
- 5.4 Contact and pattern copying
- 5.5 In lieu of a conclusion
- Abbreviations
- References
- Diachrony and the referential hierarchy in Old Irish
- 1. Introduction
- 2. One nota per verb
- 2.1 The prehistory of the paradigm of the notae augentes
- 2.2 The function of the notae augentes
- 2.3 The origin of the restriction of one nota per verb
- 3. The referential hierarchy
- 3.1 General background
- 3.2 Ranking local above non-local
- 3.3 Differentiating the local persons
- 4. Conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- Grammatical abbreviations
- References
- From ergative case-marking to hierarchical agreement
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Reyesano argument-marking system
- 2.1 Marking of nominal and pronominal NPs
- 2.2 Verbal agreement
- 2.2.1 3rd person agreement
- 2.2.2 SAP agreement
- 3. Araona, Cavineña, Ese Ejja and Tacana argument-marking systems
- 3.1 Ergative marking of nominal and pronominal NPs
- 3.2 Verbal agreement
- 4. Reconstructing the history of the Reyesano argument-marking system
- 4.1 Loss of ergative case marking
- 4.2 Rise of person prefixes
- 4.2.1 Innovation rather than retention
- 4.2.2 From independent pronouns to agreement prefixes
- 5. The genesis of hierarchical effect
- 5.1 Hierarchical pattern SAP>3
- 5.2 Hierarchical pattern 2>1
- 6. Summary and conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- References
- The direction(s) of analogical change in direct/inverse systems
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Some terminological preliminaries
- 2.1 Verb classes and animacy
- 2.2 Direct/inverse and obviation
- 2.3 Independent vs. conjunct order
- 2.4 Visualizing complex participant configurations
- 2.5 Plains Cree paradigms
- 3. The reshaping of the conjunct order in Algonquian
- 3.1 Proto-Algonquian
- 3.2 Plains Cree
- 3.3 Ojibwe
- 3.4 Mi’gmaq
- 3.5 Arapaho
- 3.6 The VTA conjunct order and its relationship to other paradigms
- 4. The directionality of analogy in polypersonal systems
- 5. Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Are the Tupi-Guarani hierarchical indexing systems really motivated by the person hierarchy?
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The person hierarchy and hierarchical indexing systems
- 3. The Tupi-Guarani indexing systems in synchrony
- 4. The Tupi-Guarani indexing systems in diachrony
- 4.1 The Proto-Tupi-Guarani system
- 4.2 The genesis of the Proto-Tupi-Guarani indexing system
- 5. Conclusion
- References
- Incipient hierarchical alignment in four Central Salish languages from the Proto-Salish middle
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Introducing and reconstructing the three distinct constructions
- 2.1 The transitive (tr) construction
- 2.2 The reflexive > middle > antipassive construction
- 2.2.1 Reflexive
- 2.2.2 Middle
- 2.2.3 Antipassive
- 2.3 The transitive-reflexive > [sg1][ZZ2]passive (-tr-mid) construction
- 3. Towards creating the hierarchy: The synchronic distribution of the three constructions
- 3.1 The local quadrant
- 3.2 The inverse quadrant
- 3.3 The direct quadrant
- 3.4 The nonlocal quadrant
- 4. Discussion
- References
- Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP indexation
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Problems of hierarchy
- 2.1 The structure of hierarchical paradigms
- 2.2 Problems of local indexation
- 2.3 Accounts of hierarchy
- 2.4 Sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman morphological change
- 3. Deictic effects in hierarchical systems
- 3.1 The original inverse in Rgyalrongic
- 3.2 Innovative inverses in Northern Naga
- 4. Sociopragmatic effects in hierarchical indexation systems
- 4.1 Merger of 1O forms in Kiranti
- 4.2 The “marked scenario”
- 5. Deictic and sociopragmatic effects
- 5.1 Reviewing the evidence
- 5.2 Typology, genre, and person
- 5.3 Patterns
- 5.4 Sociopragmatic just-so stories: It’s always about you
- Abbreviations
- References
- Morphosyntactic coding of proper names and its implications for the Animacy Hierarchy
- 1. Introduction1
- 1.1 The Animacy Hierarchy
- 1.2 The problem and the research question
- 1.3 A note on sampling
- 2. Analysis and results
- 2.1 Languages with a split ergative marking system
- 2.1.1 Split marking patterns that are in accordance with the AH
- 2.1.1.1 Case marking of P arguments. Table 3 lists all languages of our sample that obey the AH with regard to the case marking of P arguments. The rows present all marking splits that are possible with regard to the accusative marking of P arguments in s
- 2.1.1.2 Case marking of A arguments. Table 6 lists all languages of our sample that obey the AH with regard to the ergative marking of the NP in A function. Ergative case marking is found in Table 6 always to the right of the hierarchy, i.e. after the thi
- 2.1.1.3 Tripartite marking pattern. The tripartite marking pattern is taken as a separate structural category in this survey, since NPs that show this pattern have distributional properties that are distinct from NPs that show a purely ergative marking pa
- 2.1.1 Split marking patterns that are in accordance with the AH
- 2.1.2 Split marking patterns that contradict the AH
- 2.2 Languages with hierarchical marking systems
- 2.1 Languages with a split ergative marking system
- 3. Conclusions
- References
- Appendix
- Language samples
- Split ergative languages
- 1. Introduction1
- Generic person marking in Japhug and other Gyalrong languages
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Inverse and generic marking in Japhug
- 2.1 The verbal paradigms
- 2.2 Inverse in non-local scenarios
- 2.3 Generic marking
- 2.4 Inclusive vs exclusive generic marking
- 3. Nominalization in Japhug
- 3.1 Overview of participle prefixes in Japhug
- 3.2 Nominalization and generic
- 4. Tshobdun and Situ
- 4.1 Generic person marking and nominalization in Tshobdun
- 4.2 Generic person marking and nominalisation in Situ
- 5. Historical perspectives
- 5.1 From nominalization to generic marking
- 5.2 The origin of the local scenario portmanteau prefixes
- 6. Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Author index
- Language index
- Subject index
Usage statistics
Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0 Detailed usage statistics |