Карточка | Таблица | RUSMARC | |
Fritz, Gerd. Historical pragmatics of controversies: case studies from 1600 to 1800 / Gerd Fritz, Thomas Gloning, Juliane Glüer. — 1 online resource. — (Controversies). — <URL:http://elib.fa.ru/ebsco/1914577.pdf>.Дата создания записи: 14.05.2018 Тематика: Reasoning — Case studies.; Language and logic — Case studies.; Language and logic.; Reasoning.; REFERENCE / Questions & Answers Коллекции: EBSCO Разрешенные действия: –
Действие 'Прочитать' будет доступно, если вы выполните вход в систему или будете работать с сайтом на компьютере в другой сети
Действие 'Загрузить' будет доступно, если вы выполните вход в систему или будете работать с сайтом на компьютере в другой сети
Группа: Анонимные пользователи Сеть: Интернет |
Права на использование объекта хранения
Место доступа | Группа пользователей | Действие | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Локальная сеть Финуниверситета | Все | |||||
Интернет | Читатели | |||||
Интернет | Анонимные пользователи |
Оглавление
- Historical Pragmatics of Controversies
- Editorial page
- Title page
- LCC data
- Table of contents
- 1. The pragmatic organization of controversies
- 1. The study of controversies within the framework of historical pragmatics
- 2. Research on the history of controversies
- 3. The pragmatic organization of controversies in a historical perspective
- 3.1 Parameters of the pragmatic organization of controversies
- 3.2 Text types, genres and media
- 3.3 Stages of a public controversy
- 3.4 Moves and strategies
- 3.5 Topic organization and knowledge management
- 3.6 Communication principles
- 3.7 The language of controversy
- 4. Types of historical development in the pragmatic organization of controversies
- 5. Conclusion
- 6. A brief survey of the case studies presented in this volume
- References
- 2. The pragmatic organization of the Kepler/Röslin/Feselius controversy on the scientific status of astrology (1609/1611)
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Kepler, Röslin, Feselius and Schaerer: on astrology, the world system and scientific principles
- 3. The pragmatic organization of the controversy
- 3.1 The constellation of participants and their aims
- 3.2 Forms of presentation, textual structure and textual building blocks
- 3.3 The spectrum of moves
- 3.3.1 Formulating a position
- 3.3.2 Supporting a claim
- 3.3.3 Moves attacking positions
- 3.3.4 Ad hominem attacks
- 3.3.5 Clarifying moves
- 3.4 On the lexical profile of contributions to the controversy
- 4. Kepler’s theory of controversies
- 4.1 The appreciation of the value of critical activity and its functions
- 4.2 Highly valued attitudes: being open to criticism, being willing to make changes, seeking objectivity
- 4.3 Communication principles for controversies
- 5. Summary
- Acknowledgement
- References
- 3. The pragmatic organization of the Hobbes vs. Bramhall controversy (1645–1658)
- 1. Introduction
- 2. A brief summary of the background and development of the controversy
- 3. Levels and aspects of the controversy – reasons for its complexity
- 4. Typical moves, sequences of moves, and strategies
- 4.1 Addressing the audience
- 4.2 Posing a dilemma as an opening move
- 4.3 Stating the question
- 4.4 Reducing an argument into form
- 4.5 Examples, analogies, and comparisons
- 4.6 Showing “inconveniences”
- 4.7 Complaining of jargon, absurdity, and nonsense
- 4.8 Semantic analysis and definition
- 4.8.1 The definition of ‘liberty’
- 4.8.2 the will and appetite
- 4.8.3 deliberating and imagining
- 4.9 Interpreting a biblical text
- 4.10 Concessions, retractions, reformulations
- 5. Points of order and communicative principles
- 5.1 Criticizing logical or dialectical defects
- 5.1.1 Diagnosing general lack of competence
- 5.1.2 Criticizing individual moves
- 5.1.3 On misrepresenting the opponent’s position
- 5.2 Distribution of the burden of proof
- 5.3 The principle of relevance
- 5.4 The principle of perspicuity
- 5.5 The principle of completeness
- 5.6 The principle of non-repetition
- 5.7 Principles of politeness
- 5.1 Criticizing logical or dialectical defects
- 6. Creating structure in the controversy
- 7. Rhetoric and dialectics
- 8. The outcome of the controversy
- Sources
- References
- 4. Old and new medicine
- 1. The controversy, its context, and its relevance
- 2. Writing medical pamphlets in German: The vernacular strategy
- 3. The pragmatic organization of Gehema’s attacking pamphlet (1688)
- 3.1 The overall structure of the pamphlet
- 3.2 Topics and topic management in Gehema’s pamphlet
- 3.3 Moves and strategies in Gehema’s pamphlet
- 3.3.1 Gehema’s repertory of moves
- 3.3.2 Accusations and criticism
- 3.3.3 Complex argumentation
- 3.3.4 Anticipating objections and staging a virtual dialogue
- 3.3.5 Criticizing the appeal to authorities
- 3.3.6 Criticizing the appeal to experience
- 3.4 Mentioning his own medical methods
- 3.5 Thanking God for medical enlightenment
- 3.6 Gehema’s rhetoric
- 3.7 Language use
- 4. The pragmatic organization of Geuder’s pamphlet
- 4.1 Geuder’s reasons for entering the controversy
- 4.2 Principles of scientific discourse – Geuder’s preface
- 4.3 Topic management in Geuder’s pamphlet
- 4.4 Digressions as a method for evading the point-by-point constraint
- 4.5 Answering accusations and criticism – moves and strategies
- 4.5.1 Contradicting his opponent’s claim
- 4.5.2 Making a (partial) concession and adding modifications or objections
- 4.5.3 Making a distinction and refuting part of the claim
- 4.5.4 Denying presuppositions of a claim
- 4.5.5 Showing logical or dialectical defects of a move made by the opponent
- 4.5.6 Replying in kind
- 4.5.7 Appeal to experience
- 4.5.8 The demand to publish secret recipes
- 5. The dynamics and the result of the controversy
- Sources
- References
- 5. The pamphlet and its alternatives around 1700
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Advantages and problems of the classical pamphlet form
- 3. A. H. Francke’s career in controversies
- 4. Accusations from the orthodox side: Mayer’s and Roth’s attacks
- 5. Francke’s theory of controversy
- 6. The ‘Verantwortung’ (1707) as a pamphlet in the traditional style
- 6.1 The overall structure of the ‘Verantwortung’
- 6.2 The point-by-point method
- 6.2.1 Referring to the writings of the opponent
- 6.2.2 The principle of thorough response
- 6.2.3 Flouting the point-by-point principle: Digressions and inserted documentation
- 6.3 Characteristic individual moves
- 6.3.1 Direct contradiction
- 6.3.2 Criticism of logical and dialectical defects
- 6.3.3 Accusation of violating communication principles
- 6.3.4 Refutation with reference to the authority of the Bible
- 6.3.5 Refutation with reference to theological authorities
- 6.3.6 The retort
- 7. The search for alternatives to the pamphlet: open letters and polemical sermons
- 7.1 Open letters to sympathisers
- 7.2 The polemical sermon
- 8. Conclusion
- Sources
- References
- 6. Leibniz vs. Locke
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The NE – what kind of text?
- 3. The NE as a refutation pamphlet based on the disputation model
- 4. Topic management
- 4.1 Aspects of topic management
- 4.2 Elements of topic management
- 4.2.1 Global topic structure
- 4.2.2 Dealing with repetitions
- 4.2.3 Indicating thematic connections and topic change
- 4.3 Introducing Leibniz’s own topics
- 4.4 Introducing and indicating digressions
- 4.5 Making topic structures explicit
- 5. Philalethes’ first move – rendering Locke’s material
- 5.1 Leibniz’s task
- 5.2 Selecting and condensing
- 5.3 Rendering Locke’s wording
- 6. The second move: Theophilus’ comments
- 6.1 Aspects of the second move
- 6.2 Direct confrontation
- 6.3 Critical moves
- 6.4 Refutation
- 6.5 Voicing agreement
- 6.6 Agreeing and adding objections or modifications
- 6.7 Giving extra information and explanations
- 7. Making the third move: Philalethes
- 7.1 Producing natural dialogue
- 7.2 Connecting to the following point by the use of ‘but’
- 7.3 Signaling agreement
- 7.4 Conceding a point made by Theophilus
- 8. Forms of intertextuality
- 9. Conclusion
- References
- 7. Reviews and responses
- 1. Introduction
- 1.1 Aims of this case study
- 1.2 Semler’s treatise on the canon as a contribution to biblical criticism
- 1.3 The structure of the controversy
- 1.4 Semler’s publishing strategy
- 2. Types of review and responses
- 2.1 Journals and reviews
- 2.2 Functions of different types of review
- 2.3 On the structure of reviews – the principle of brevity
- 2.4 A critical review and Semler’s response
- 2.4.1 The review
- 2.4.2 Semler’s response
- 2.5 A cooperative review and Semler’s response
- 2.5.1 A cooperative review
- 2.5.2 Semler’s response: the cooperative reply
- 2.6 Report and counter-proposal – Ernesti’s review and Semler’s response
- 2.6.1 Ernesti’s review
- 2.6.2 Semler’s response to Ernesti
- 2.7 A mediatory review and Semler’s response
- 2.7.1 Michaelis’ review
- 2.7.2 Semler’s response to the mediatory review
- 2.5.1 A cooperative review
- 3. Objections and principles of communication
- 3.1 Objections to a lack of clarity
- 3.2 Objections to a lack of proof
- 3.3 Objections to irrelevance
- 3.4 Objections to taking a questionable position
- 3.5 Objections to a lack of impartiality
- 3.6 The principle of tolerance
- 3.7 Principles of politeness
- 4. On the outcome of the controversy
- 5. Conclusion
- 1. Sources
- References
- 1. Introduction
- 8. Controversy and conversion
- 1. Introduction
- 2. A brief survey of the controversy
- 3. The debate on the negative weight of phlogiston
- 3.1 Gren vs. Westrumb
- 3.2 Gren vs. Mayer
- 4. Crucial experiments and further steps of retreat
- 4.1 A second phase in the controversy
- 4.2 A comparison of theories
- 4.3 The notorious reduction experiment
- 4.4 Gren’s conversion and its background
- 5. Handbooks as a vehicle of controversy
- 6. Concluding remarks: Life between two paradigms
- Sources
- References
- About the authors
- Subject index
Статистика использования
Количество обращений: 0
За последние 30 дней: 0 Подробная статистика |