FinUniversity Electronic Library

     
?

Details
Card Table RUSMARC

New trends on grammaticalization and language change / edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban, José Vicente Lozano. — 1 online resource. — (Studies in language companion series). — <URL:http://elib.fa.ru/ebsco/1946891.pdf>.

Record create date: 10/17/2018

Subject: Grammar, Comparative and general — Grammaticalization.; Linguistic change.; Grammar, Comparative and general — Case studies. — Grammaticalization; Linguistic change — Case studies.; LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General

Collections: EBSCO

Allowed Actions: –

Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network

Group: Anonymous

Network: Internet

Document access rights

Network User group Action
Finuniversity Local Network All Read Print Download
Internet Readers Read Print
-> Internet Anonymous

Table of Contents

  • New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
  • Editorial page
  • Title page
  • Copyright page
  • Table of contents
  • Introduction
    • 1. Grammaticalization from 1980s–2000s
    • 2. Grammaticalization in the 2010s as reflected in this volume
      • 2.1 A revival of typological explorations of grammaticalization
      • 2.2 Accounting for the distinctive features of the development of discourse markers as grammaticalization
      • 2.3 Modelling grammaticalization: Diachronic construction grammar and lexical functional grammar
      • 2.4 Revisiting the cognitive principles underlying and motivating grammaticalization
    • Brief summary and outlook
    • References
  • Part 1. General issues
  • Are there two different ways of approaching grammaticalization?
    • 1. Discourse markers: A problem for grammaticalization
    • 2. Two approaches to grammaticalization
      • 2.1 Reduction vs. expansion
      • 2.2 Problems with the GR/GE distinction
      • 2.3 Conclusions
    • 3. Problematic features of discourse markers
      • 3.1 Movement outside of the morphosyntax of a sentence
      • 3.2 From prosodically integrated to non-integrated status
      • 3.3 From meaning as part of a sentence to metatextual function
      • 3.4 From restricted structural scope to scope beyond the sentence
      • 3.5 Conclusion
    • 4. A two-stage scenario
      • 4.1 Discourse markers as theticals
      • 4.2 Grammaticalization
    • 5. Discussion
    • 6. Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Functional similarity despite geographical distance
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. German ‘mal’: A historical reconstruction
    • 3. Previous views on ‘mal’
    • 4. From ‘minimal frequency’ to ‘minimal effort’
    • 5. Mandarin ‘yíxià’
    • 6. Historical development of 一下 ‘yíxià’
    • 7. Previous views on ‘yíxià’
    • 8. From ‘minimal frequency’ to ‘minimal duration/effort’
    • 9. Summary and conclusions
    • References
    • Examples in Chinese characters
  • Analogy
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Analogy in usage-based models: Construction grammar and grammaticalization
    • 3. Analogy
      • 3.1 Analogy and Herman Paul’s ‘Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte’ (1880 [1909])
      • 3.2 Analogy and cognitive science
    • 4. The influence of analogy in morphosyntactic change
      • 4.1 A case study where analogy is not given a primary role
      • 4.2 Case studies where analogy is given a primary role
    • 5. A brief conclusion
    • Acknowledgement
    • References
  • Central Southern Guangxi as a grammaticalization area
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. The ecological context and language diversity
      • 2.1 Geography and history
      • 2.2 Language profiles
    • 3. Polyfunctionality and versatility
      • 3.1 Polyfunctional ‘finish’
        • a. Universal quantifier
        • b. Superlative
        • c. Perfect/perfective aspect marker
        • d. Conjunction
      • 3.2 Polyfunctional ‘go’
        • a. Imperative marker
        • b. Emphatic particle
      • 3.3 Polyfunctional ‘give’
        • a. Benefactive marker
        • b. Malefactive marker
        • c. Cause marker
      • 3.4 Polyfunctional ‘take’
      • 3.5 Interim summary
    • 4. Borrowed grammaticalization
    • 5. Conclusion
    • Abbreviations
    • Other symbols
    • References
  • Grammaticalizing connectives in English and discourse information structure
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Discourse connectives
      • 2.1 Grammaticalization and discourse connectives
      • 2.2 Positions of discourse connectives
      • 2.3 Coherence relations and information structure
    • 3. Grammaticalizing discourse connectives and position
      • 3.1 Two recent Engish connectives
      • 3.2 In fact
        • 3.2.1 Evolution of ‘in fact’
        • 3.1.2 Position of ‘in fact’
      • 3.3 After all
        • 3.3.1 Evolution of ‘after all’
        • 3.3.2 Position of ‘after all’
      • 3.4 Findings for ‘in fact’ and ‘after all’
    • 4. Grammaticalization and information structure beyond the sentence
    • 5. Conclusion
    • Appendix. Data sources
    • References
  • Part 2. Case studies
  • The noun phrase
  • The grammaticalization of interrogative pronouns into relative pronouns in South-Caucasian languages
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Postnominal relative clauses introduced by relative pronouns in South Caucasian languages
    • 3. The possibility of an internal development
      • 3.1 Correlative relatives in South Caucasian languages
      • 3.2 A development from correlative relatives into postnominal finite relatives?
      • 3.3 An argument in support: Cases of case attraction in Old Georgian
    • 4. The possibility of a contact-induced development
      • 4.1 ‘European’ languages in contact with Old Georgian
      • 4.2 Other languages of the South Caucasus area displaying postnominal finite RCs introduced by relative pronouns built on interrogative pronouns
      • 4.3 The subordinating particle
    • 5. Conclusion
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • The verbal phrase
  • From time to surprise
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. How to deal with the future
    • 3. The mirative future
    • 4. Analysis: ‘Será posible’ in contemporary Spanish
    • 5. Conclusions
    • References
  • C-gravitation and the grammaticalization degree of “present progressives” in English, French, and Dutch
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Previous studies
      • 2.1 Boogaart (1999)
      • 2.2 De Wit & Patard (2013) and De Wit, Patard & Brisard (2013)
      • 2.3 Mortier (2008)
      • 2.4 Beyond Mortier’s analysis
    • 3. C-gravitation
      • 3.1 Background to C-gravitation
      • 3.2 Two types of C-gravitation
    • 4. Explanation
    • 5. Consequence
    • 6. Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • The avertive and proximative grams in Maltese using the auxiliary ‘għodd’
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Għodd
    • 3. The avertive and proximative constructions headed by ‘għodd’
      • 3.1 The morphosyntax of the avertive construction
      • 3.2 The morphosyntax of the proximative construction
      • 3.3 The POLARITY feature and the avertive and proximative constructions
    • 4. Further development of the auxiliary ‘għodd’
    • 5. Discussions and conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Discourse markers
  • Pragmatic uses of ‘nu’ in Old Saxon and Old English
    • 1. Preliminaries
      • 1.1 Theoretical background
      • 1.2 Object
      • 1.3 Method and outline
    • 2. Multiple uses of ‘nu’ in Old English and Old Saxon
      • 2.1 Lexical use of ‘nu’: Temporal (and contrastive) adverb
        • 2.1.1 Formal features
        • 2.1.2 Meaning
      • 2.2 Grammatical use of ‘nu’: From adverb to conjunction
      • 2.3 Possible MP uses
        • 2.3.1 Following imperatives
        • 2.3.2 Other post-verbal uses of ‘nu’
        • 2.3.3 Concluding remarks on potential MP uses
      • 2.4 Possible DM uses
        • 2.4.1 Possible DM uses in Old Saxon
        • 2.4.2 Possible DM uses in Old English
        • 2.4.3 Concluding remarks on potential DM uses
    • 3. Conclusion
    • References
  • (Inter)subjectification and paradigmaticization
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Previous literature
    • 3. Presentation of the data
    • 4. Diachronic evolution of semantico-pragmatic meanings in the corpus
      • 4.1 Textual values
      • 4.2 Attitudinal values
      • 4.3 Social value
    • 5. Lexical, procedural and structural persistence
    • 6. (Inter)subjectification and Traugott’s (2010) subjectivity cline
    • 7. Paradigmaticization
      • 7.1 Word order, grammaticalization and paradigms
      • 7.2 Final ‘but’ and paradigmaticization
    • 8. Conclusion
    • References
  • The development of three classifiers into
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Constructions and constructionalisation
    • 3. The history and analysis of ‘yi xie’
      • 3.1 The history of ‘yi xie’
      • 3.2 The analysis of ‘yi xie’
    • 4. The histories and analyses of ‘yi dian’ and ‘yi xia’
      • 4.1 The history of ‘yi dian’
      • 4.2 The history of ‘yi xia’
      • 4.3 The analyses of ‘yi dian’ and ‘yi xia’
    • 5. Conclusion
    • References
  • From the inside to the outside of the sentence
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Background
      • 2.1 A short history of ‘jijitsu’
      • 2.2 Overview of research on ‘jijitsu’
        • 2.2.1 A commentary inductive adverb at sentence-initial position
        • 2.2.2 A kind of adverbial connector between sentences
        • 2.2.3 Boundary between written and spoken languages
      • 2.3 Interim summary
    • 3. Corpora
    • 4. Survey results
      • 4.1 Modern Japanese periods
      • 4.2 Present-day Japanese periods
    • 5. Summary and discussion
      • 5.1 From the inside to the outside of the sentence for a larger discourse unit
      • 5.2 Why constructionalization works
      • 5.3 Local changes inside the sentence
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • The development of the Chinese scalar additive coordinators derived from prohibitives
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. The constructional approach
    • 3. The diachronic development of the SAC
      • 3.1 The discourse contexts giving rise to the SAC
      • 3.2 The rise of the SAC
    • 4. The diffusional change of the SAC construction
    • 5. Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Cross-varietal diversity in constructional entrenchment
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Data
    • 3. Final tags
      • 3.1 Final tags as retrospective types of pragmatic markers
      • 3.2 Final tags as pragmatic markers at grammatical completion points
    • 4. Results
      • 4.1 Type and token frequencies
      • 4.2 Some notable differences between the two varieties
        • 4.2.1 AUX-tags
        • 4.2.2 Clausal FIX-tags
        • 4.2.3 Lexical FIX-tags
        • 4.2.3.4 So.
        • 4.2.3.5 Adverbs of factuality
        • 4.2.3.6 Adverbs of totality
        • 4.2.3.7 ‘Yes’ or ‘no’ words
        • 4.2.3.8 Non-word phonological sequences
        • 4.2.3.9 Right
    • 5. A constructional account of final-tagged structures
      • 5.1 Grammatical constructionalization (Grammatical Cxzn)
      • 5.2 Constructionalization and final-tagged structures
      • 5.3 Constructional entrenchment of final-tagged structures in Irish and American English
      • 5.4 Motivating factors for the development of the final-tag construction in Irish English
    • 6. Conclusion
    • Acknowledgment
    • References
    • Appendix A. A list of final tags in SPICE-Ireland
    • Appendix B. A list of final tags in SBC
  • Subject index

Usage statistics

stat Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0
Detailed usage statistics