Card | Table | RUSMARC | |
International Conference on Construction Grammar. Constructions in contact: constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic languages / edited by Hans C. Boas, University of Texas at Austin ; Steffen Höder, Kiel University. — 1 online resource. — (Constructional approaches to language). — The volume is based on papers given at the ICCG-8 workshop, which was a part of the Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction Grammar. — <URL:http://elib.fa.ru/ebsco/1947655.pdf>.Record create date: 11/27/2018 Subject: Construction grammar — Congresses.; Germanic languages — Congresses. — Grammar; LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General. Collections: EBSCO Allowed Actions: –
Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Group: Anonymous Network: Internet |
Document access rights
Network | User group | Action | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finuniversity Local Network | All |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||
Internet | Readers |
![]() ![]() |
||||
![]() |
Internet | Anonymous |
Table of Contents
- Constructions in Contact
- Editorial page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Table of contents
- Preface
- Part I. Constructions in contact
- Construction Grammar and language contact
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Theoretical approaches to language contact phenomena
- 3. Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics
- 4. Constructions in contact
- 5. Overview of the chapters
- 6. Conclusions
- Acknowledgment
- References
- Grammar is community-specific
- 1. (Why) Yet another approach?
- 2. Insights from contact linguistics: Language contact and its status in linguistic theory
- Argument 1: Language contact is everywhere
- Argument 2: Languages interact in multilingual speakers’ cognition
- Argument 3: Language contact affects language structure
- Argument 4: Multilingualism serves a community’s needs
- Argument 5: What is a language, anyway?
- 3. Taking usage-based CxG seriously: Towards socio-cognitive realism
- 4. An integrated approach: The repertoire as constructicon
- 4.1 Language-specificity as a constructional property
- 4.2 Constructions without borders: Idioconstructions and diaconstructions
- 4.3 Language-specific input vs. diasystematic constructicon?
- 4.4 Pro-diasystematic change
- 4.5 Generalisation gone wild?
- 5. Conclusion
- Acknowledgment
- References
- Part II. Constructional variation and change in contact
- Towards a constructional analysis of the progressive aspect in Texas German
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The progressive aspect in English and German
- 2.1 Progressive aspect
- 2.2 The progressive aspect in English, Standard German, and dialectal German
- 3. A Construction Grammar approach to progressive aspect
- 4. Progressive marking in Texas German
- 4.1 The present tense (progressive) construction with an optional adverb
- 4.1.1 The present tense (progressive) construction in Gilbert (1972), Guion (1996), and the TGDA
- 4.1.2 A TxG pres(prog) construction
- 4.2 The ‘am’-progressive
- 4.2.1 The ‘am’-progressive in Gilbert (1972), Guion (1996), and the TGDA
- 4.2.2 A TxG ‘am’-progressive construction
- 4.3 The ‘tun’-progressive
- 4.3.1 The ‘tun’-construction in Gilbert (1972), Guion (1996), and the TGDA
- 4.3.2 A TxG ‘tun’-progressive construction
- 4.1 The present tense (progressive) construction with an optional adverb
- 5. Summary and conclusion
- References
- Tense and aspect marking in (Low) German perfect constructions based on variety contact
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Introduction to the German split auxiliary system
- 3. Situation of Low German in Westphalia and Emsland
- 4. Method – Field research and survey design
- 5. Qualitative characterization of the phenomenon in contact
- 5.1. The phenomenon in the dialect variety
- 5.2. The phenomenon in the (regional) standard variety
- 6. Quantitative empirical analysis
- 7. Aspectual contours of lexical and grammatical aspect
- 8. Modeling in the framework of Construction Grammar
- 9. Conclusion
- Acknowledgment
- References
- A. Appendix
- Distributional assimilation in constructional semantics
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Theoretical preliminaries
- 2.1 Diachronic constructional semasiology
- 2.2 Distributional assimilation
- 3. The contact situation Afrikaans–English
- 4. Three possible cases of contact-related change in Afrikaans three-argument constructions
- 4.1 Introducing the English and Afrikaans ditransitive constructions
- 4.2 ‘Ballistic motion’ uses
- 4.3 Dispossession uses: A case study of ‘ontneem’ (‘take away’)
- 4.4 Secundative patterns with verbs of giving
- 5. General discussion
- 6. Conclusion and outlook
- Acknowledgment
- References
- Part III. Item-based patterns and constructional generalizations in contact
- Constructions as cross-linguistic generalizations over instances
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Passives – a brief overview
- 3. Passives and actives as linguistic resources
- 4. Patterns and constructions: Swedish
- 5. The Finnish “passive”
- 6. Patterns, language contact, and language change
- 7. Solf Swedish
- 8. Constructional pattern contact
- 9. Implications
- Acknowledgment
- References
- Texas German and English word order constructions in contact
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Previous accounts of Texas German word order
- 2.1 Texas German(s)
- 2.2 German word order
- 2.3 Word order in TxG
- 3. Word order in (Diasystematic) Construction Grammar
- 4. German word order constructions and German-English diaconstructions
- 4.1. German word order constructions
- 4.2 English-German word order diaconstructions
- (A) Subject precedes verb
- (B) All verbs occur together
- (C) Finite verbs precede non-finite verb forms
- (D) Polar questions require ‘do’ support
- 5. Analysis of TxG word order
- 5.1 Data selection and limitations
- 5.2. TxG clauses with German-origin verbs
- ‘Müssen’ (‘to have to’)
- ‘Dass’ (‘that’)
- ‘Weil’ (‘because’)
- Because
- 5.3 TxG utterances with English verbs
- Infinitival clauses
- Polar questions
- Subordinate clauses
- Main clauses
- 5.4. Summary of TxG word order
- 5.5. (Diasystematic) constructional account of divergent TxG syntax
- Multiple lexical transference
- (Inaccurate) complex German structures
- Transferring complex verb constructions with lexicogrammatical interference
- Loan Translation of more general and ‘central’ constructions
- Multiple transference and interference in a single clause
- 6. Conclusion
- References
- Part IV. Semantic frames in contact
- A constructional account of the modal particle ‘ja’ in Texas German
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Texas German: History and documentation
- 3. Distribution of English and German DPs and MPs in Texas German
- 4. Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics
- 5. Formalizing the distribution of ‘ja’ in TxG
- 5.1 Frame-evoking senses of ‘ja’
- 5.2 Pragmatics of Implicit Anchoring (PIA)
- 5.3 Formalizing discourse patterns as constructions
- 6. Conclusions and outlook
- Acknowledgment
- References
- Frames change in language contact environments
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Background
- 2.1. Frame Semantics and FrameNet
- 2.2 Moving across languages
- 3. Methodology
- 3.1 The Free Sorting Method
- 3.2 Participants: Districts and background data
- 3.3 The List of motion verbs
- 3.4 Sorting procedure & analysis
- 4. Results
- 4.1 Dendrograms
- 4.2 Logistic regression analysis
- 5. Follow-up measure: Participant Feedback
- 5.1. Video stimuli and Procedure
- 5.2 Student feedback
- 6. The suggested frame change
- 7. Conclusion
- References
- Author index
- Index of constructions
- Subject index
Usage statistics
|
Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0 Detailed usage statistics |