Card | Table | RUSMARC | |
Perspectives on language structure and language change: studies in honor of Henning Andersen / edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh, Lene Schøsler. — 1 online resource. — (Current issues in linguistic theory). — <URL:http://elib.fa.ru/ebsco/2156439.pdf>.Record create date: 3/4/2019 Subject: Linguistic change.; Grammar, Comparative and general.; Grammar, Comparative and general.; Linguistic change.; LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General Collections: EBSCO Allowed Actions: –
Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Group: Anonymous Network: Internet |
Document access rights
Network | User group | Action | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finuniversity Local Network | All | |||||
Internet | Readers | |||||
Internet | Anonymous |
Table of Contents
- PERSPECTIVES ON LANGUAGE STRUCTURE AND LANGUAGE CHANGE
- Editorial page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Table of contents
- Preface
- Perspectives on language structure and language change: An introduction
- Theory of language change
- Indexicality
- Problems of reanalysis
- Actualization
- Language change and diachronic typology in Balto-Slavic
- Concluding remarks
- References
- Part I. On the theory of language change
- Andersen (1973) and dichotomies of change
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Evolutive versus adaptive and its historical context
- 2.1 Evolutive versus adaptive in Andersen (1973)
- 2.2 Earlier conceptions of this distinction
- 3. Evolutive versus adaptive and ADC’s reception
- 3.1 Initial survey
- 3.2 The continued development of the evolutive/adaptive dichotomy
- 3.3 Reception of evolutive versus adaptive: The first twenty-five years
- 4. Why this reception for ADC and the evolutive/adaptive distinction?
- 4.1 Generative rules?
- 4.2 Competing terminological distinctions
- 5. More recent attention for ADC and the evolutive/adaptive distinction
- 5.1 “Adaptive sound change” in Dahl (2004)
- 5.2 A recent resurgence?
- 6. Conclusion
- References
- Induction and tradition: “As time goes by …” – Play it again!
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Language acquisition and change in the context of Total Human Evolutionary Communication
- 2. Language acquisition and change in the context of Total Human Evolutionary Communication
- 2.1 Cognitive Consciousness and Communicative Consciousness
- 2.2 Perception vs. Communication
- 2.3 The same old story: The trivium of Communion, Practice, and Tradition
- 2.3 The same old story: The trivium of Communion, Practice, and Tradition
- 3. The architectonic of languaging: Total Human Evolutionary Communication
- 3.1 The levels of Total Human Evolutionary Cognition and Communication (THECC)
- 3.2 The evolution of Languaging Semiosis into Language Gaming
- 3.3 The evolution of Language Gaming
- 3.4 Language Gaming as a teleological process: Energeia – entelechy and syntaxis
- 3.4 Language Gaming as a teleological process: Energeia – entelechy and syntaxis
- 3.5 The social deontology of Language Gaming
- 3.6 The two peripheral phases of Language Gaming: Dynamis and ergon – paradeigma and syntagma
- 3.6 The two peripheral phases of Language Gaming: Dynamis and ergon – paradeigma and syntagma
- 4. Communication, meta-communication, and Universals of Language Gaming (the ‘three-in-one’)
- 4.1 Communion (panchronic)
- 4.2 Practice (synchronic)
- 4.3 Tradition (diachronic)
- 4.3.1 Abduction – discovery: Linguistic experiences as surprising facts to be explained by a linguistic competence (G1)
- 4.3.1 Abduction – discovery: Linguistic experiences as surprising facts to be explained by a linguistic competence (G1)
- 4.3.2 Deduction – experimentation: The trial and error testing of the predicted consequences of the hypothesized linguistic competence (G1) as put to Practice (G2)
- 4.3.3 Induction – confirmation: The Conventionalization of the Communicative Competence (G3)
- 4.3.3 Induction – confirmation: The Conventionalization of the Communicative Competence (G3)
- 5. “As time goes by …” – Play it again! – Induction and Tradition
- 5.1 The semiotics of Tradition – the Competence and its stratal architectonic
- 5.2 The evolution of the Human Language Faculty and the deontological Linguistic Institution
- 5.3 Language change, phylo-, onto-, and glosso-genetically
- 6. Conclusion
- As time goes by: For HA
- References
- Approaching the typology and diachrony of morphological reversals
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Typology of inverted morphological relations
- 2.1 Types of inversion
- 2.2 Full morphological reversals
- 2.3 Partial morphological reversals
- 2.4 Morphological quasi-reversals
- 2.5 Summary
- 3. Lessons from diachrony: Accounting for the rise of reversals
- 3.1 Old French declensional classes
- 3.2 The expression of paral reference in Upper Sorbian
- 4. The economy of marker inversion and the role of morphological ambiguity
- 5. Conclusion
- References
- Deconstructing markedness in sound change typology: Notes on θ > f and f > θ
- 1. Asymmetries in sound change typology
- 2. Perceptual similarity and sound change: The case of θ > f
- 3. θ > f without pre-existing /f/?
- 4. Frequency of θ > f
- 5. Is there f > θ sound change?
- 6. Explanations
- 7. Markedness?
- Acknowledgment
- References
- Andersen (1973) and dichotomies of change
- Part II. Indexicality
- Diachronic morphology, indexical function and a critique of the morphome analysis: The content and expression of Danish forstå
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Autonomous morphology and the stand morphome
- 3. Content and expression of morphology
- 3.1 The problem with autonomous syntax and morphology
- 3.2 Sign relations in grammar
- 4. The history of forstå and overvære
- 4.1 Forstå
- 4.2 Overvære
- 5. Explaining forstå and overvære
- 5.1 Compositionality and metaphoricity
- 5.2 Indexicality
- 5.3 Isomorphism and non-isomorphism
- 6. Conclusion
- References
- Word order as grammaticalised semiotic systems
- 1. Introduction: The neglect of word order
- 2. Symbolic and indexical signs in morphology
- 2.1 Andersen’s analysis of Latin cucurristi
- 2.2 Indexicality in the analysis of case and word order
- 2.3 The symbolic function of constructional case
- 3. Word order systems as diagrams of morphosyntactic structure
- 3.1 Valency, construction and topological diagrams: Danish direct objects and prepositional objects
- 3.2 The semantic change of several and diagrammatic mappings
- 4. Word order differences as symbolic signs
- 4.1 Diagrammatic representations of information structure
- 4.2 Germanic V2 examples
- 5. The example of Old English
- 5.1 Old English V2 order and SOV order
- 5.2 Topological integrity of pronominal forms
- 5.3 Examples for topological generalisation
- 5.4 The grammatical function of the second position in Old English
- 6. Conclusion
- Sources
- References
- Appendix. Tables of central examples from this article
- Diachronic morphology, indexical function and a critique of the morphome analysis: The content and expression of Danish forstå
- Part III. Problems of reanalysis
- Anticausative and passive in Vedic: Which way reanalysis?
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Structural characteristics of passive vs. anticausative in Vedic
- 3. Historical relationship between passives and anticausatives
- 3.1 Early accounts
- 3.2 Kulikov’s accounts and a possible alternative
- 3.3 Another alternative account
- 3.4 A further possibility
- 3.5 Evaluation and conclusions
- References
- Grammaticalization and degrammati(calizati)on in the development of the Iranian verb system
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The realignment of the erstwhile possessive construction as the finite verb form
- 2. The realignment of the erstwhile possessive construction as the finite verb form
- 3. The establishment of the analytic perfect in early new Persian
- 4. Degrammati(calizati)on of the copula in retrospective (perfect) aspect
- 5. Grammaticalization in new Persian of the adverb hamēw ‘always’
- 6. Future tense
- 7. Passive diathesis
- 8. Conclusion
- Text (Middle Persian)
- References
- Aspects of grammaticalization and reanalysis in the voice domain in the transition from Latin to early Italo-Romance
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Auxiliarization, light verb constructions and voice
- 2.1 Auxiliaries vs light verbs
- 2.1.1 Auxiliarization and changes in the argument structure of predicates
- 2.1.2 Light/vector/serial verbs and argument structure
- 2.1 Auxiliaries vs light verbs
- 3. Light verbs and (passive) auxiliaries in Late Latin and early (Italo-)Romance
- 3. Light verbs and (passive) auxiliaries in Late Latin and early (Italo-)Romance
- 3.1 Fieri and its early Italo-Romance continuants
- 3.2 Venire in Late Latin and early Italo-Romance
- 4. Origin of BECOME and COME as voice markers and light verbs
- 4.1 Light verb behaviour of the passive auxiliary essere ‘be’
- 5. Auxiliaries, light verbs and change in the passage to Italo-Romance
- 6. Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Old Italian sources
- References
- From preverbal to postverbal in the early history of Japanese
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Complex predicates in Old Japanese
- 3. A diachronic understanding of the Japanese aktionsart verbs
- 4. Other similar developments
- 5. Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Reanalysis in the Russian past tense: The gerundial perfect
- 1. Introduction
- 2. New perfects in Slavic
- 2.1 The possessive perfect
- 3. New perfects in Russian
- 3.1 The Russian possessive perfect
- 3.2 The Russian gerundial perfect
- 4. The source and chronology of the GP
- 5. From secondary to primary predicates
- 5.1 Subordination by a finite verb
- 5.2 Reanalysis of the secondary predicate
- 5.3 Actualization of the reanalysis of the secondary predicate
- 5.4 Additional reanalysis and actualization
- 5.5 Clause subordination as actualization and extension
- 5.6 Interchangeability of predicative participles and the l-participle
- 5.7 Completed reanalysis and actualization of the secondary predicates
- 6. Coordination of the GP with present tense
- 7. The morphology of the gerundial perfect
- 8. Conclusion
- References
- From a single lexical unit to multiple grammatical paradigms
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Theoretical frame
- 2.1 Grammation and regrammation
- 2.2 Paradigms
- 3. Constructions of presentation and focus
- 3.1 Definitions
- 3.2 Inventory of structures
- 3.2.1 C’est X
- 3.2.2 Il y a X
- 3.2.3 Il est X
- 3.2.4 Voici/voilà X
- 3.2.5 Avoir X qui
- 3.2.6 X est là qui
- 3.2.7 Je vois X qui
- 3.3 Conclusion on partial paradigms
- 4. Conclusion
- References
- Morphosyntactic reanalysis in Australian languages: Three studies
- 1. Introduction and overview
- 2. Boundary loss with creation of morphological zero
- 3. Reanalysis of alignment: Ergative to accusative
- 4. Clause fusion to auxiliary constructions and inflections marking Associated Motion
- 5. Summary and conclusions
- References
- Definiteness in Germanic and Balto-Slavic: Historical and comparative perspectives
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Germanic
- 2.1 Definiteness formations
- 2.2 Functional and morphological developments
- 3. Baltic
- 4. Slavic
- 5. Conclusion: Areal patterning of definiteness in Germanic and Balto-Slavic
- 5. Conclusion: Areal patterning of definiteness in Germanic and Balto-Slavic
- References
- Anticausative and passive in Vedic: Which way reanalysis?
- Part IV. Actualization
- Diatopy and frequency as indicators of spread: Accentuation in Bulgarian dialects
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The data
- 2.1 Sources
- 2.2. Description
- 2.3 Preparation for analysis
- 2.4 Geographical distribution
- 2.5 A second data set: “Additional accentuation”
- 2.6 Historical commentary: Double accent
- 3. Conclusion
- References
- Suppletion or illusion?: The diachrony of suppletive derivation
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Issues
- References
- Diatopy and frequency as indicators of spread: Accentuation in Bulgarian dialects
- Part V. Language change and diachronic typology in Balto-Slavic
- A complicated relationship: Balto-Slavic accentual mobility as a non-trivial shared innovation
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The Balto-Slavic problem
- 3. The Baltic problem
- 4. Non-trivial shared innovations
- 5. Genealogically shared innovations vs. contact-induced shared innovations
- 6. Accentual mobility as a shared innovation
- 6.1 Introductory remarks
- 6.2 Pedersen’s Law, Barytonesis, Accent Retraction: Kortlandt
- 6.3 Saussure–Pedersen’s Law, Proto-Vasil’ev–Dolobko’s Law: Jasanoff
- 6.4 Mobility Law: Olander
- 7. Conclusion
- References
- Name-calling: The Russian ‘new Vocative’ and its status
- 1. Introduction: What is a Vocative?
- 2. The Russian “new Vocative” and its peculiarities
- 2.1 Pragmatic peculiarities
- 2.2 Lexical peculiarities
- 2.3 Syntactic peculiarities
- 2.4 Morphophonological peculiarities
- 2.5 Phonological peculiarities
- 3. Similar peculiarities elsewhere in Russian and Slavic
- 3.1 Pragmatic peculiarities
- 3.2 Lexical peculiarities
- 3.3 Syntactic outliers
- 3.4 Morphophonological outliers
- 3.5 Phonological outliers
- 4. The emergence of a “new Vocative” in North Saami
- 5. Conclusions
- References
- Changes of tense and modality in Late Mediaeval Slovene: Transference, extension or both?
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Slovene between the Freising fragments and the Rateče manuscript
- 2.1 The past tenses in the Freising fragments
- 2.2 The Rateče manuscript
- 3. Trubar’s Catechismus 1550: How much did Luther’s Catechismus influence Trubar’s Slovene
- 4. Conclusions
- Abbreviations
- References
- A complicated relationship: Balto-Slavic accentual mobility as a non-trivial shared innovation
- Index
Usage statistics
Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0 Detailed usage statistics |