Card | Table | RUSMARC | |
Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age: theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language / edited by Marianna Bolognesi, Mario Brdar, Kristina Despot. — 1 online resource. — (Metaphor in language, cognition, and communication). — <URL:http://elib.fa.ru/ebsco/2228941.pdf>.Record create date: 4/29/2019 Subject: Metaphor.; Metonyms.; Digital libraries.; Digital libraries.; Metaphor.; Metonyms. Collections: EBSCO Allowed Actions: –
Action 'Read' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Action 'Download' will be available if you login or access site from another network
Group: Anonymous Network: Internet |
Document access rights
Network | User group | Action | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finuniversity Local Network | All | |||||
Internet | Readers | |||||
Internet | Anonymous |
Table of Contents
- Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age
- Editorial page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Table of contents
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Fantastic metaphors and where to find them
- 1. Metaphor and metonymy repositories
- 2. A preview of this volume
- 2.1 New methods and digital resources for mining metaphor and metonymy in thought, language, and images
- 2.2 Reflecting on the risks and challenges involved in building and using repositories of figurative language
- 3. Summary
- References
- 1. MetaNet
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Frames, mappings and grammatical constructions
- 3. Metaphor and grammar
- 4. Primary metaphors and metaphor cascades
- 5. Multi-lingual metaphor detection: Towards understanding social issues
- 6. Conclusions and future developments
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendix 1. Sources and IDs of cited examples
- Appendix 2. Raw frequencies of Taxation source domain classes in Table 4.
- 2. The tripartite typology and the Córdoba Metonymy Database
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Brief description of the Córdoba Metonymy Database and its entry model with special attention to the field Hierarchical Level
- 2.1 Problems involved in the completion of the database
- 2.2 Some specific comments on the fields “Hierarchical Level” and “Other Hierarchical Levels”
- 3. Challenges to the tripartite generic typology in recent research on metonymy : A brief discussion
- 3.1 The proposal by Ruiz de Mendoza and his collaborators to reduce the typology to whole f
- 3.2 Panther and Thornburg’s proposal to reduce the typology to part for whole from an “intensional” perspective
- 4. Criteria applied in the database to determine Whole and Part status at the generic level of a hierarchy
- 4.1 Preliminaries
- 4.2 The criteria
- Rule 1
- Rule 2
- Rule 3
- Sub-rule 3a: Search for additional information on the relevant meronymy
- Sub-rule 3b: Determine the meronymic structure of abstract sources and targets
- Sub-rule 3b-1: Distinguish between frames and frame elements, especially when the same term is used to designate both
- Sub-rule 3b-2: Observe the degree of “strength of contact” (Peirsman & Geeraerts 2006) between source and target in concrete or material domains, and the degree of “strength of conceptual connection” between source and target in abstract domains.
- Sub-rule 3c: Identify the “reference frame / icm” or “functional domain” within which, or by reference to which, the metonymy occurs.
- 5. Concluding remarks
- References
- 3. Metaphor in the age of mechanical production
- 1. Introduction
- 2. From potential metaphors to deliberate metaphors
- 3. Potential similes and affective models
- 3.1 Affective modelling
- 4. Metaphor interpretation as metaphor expansion
- 4.1 Metaphor expansion
- 4.2 Metaphor in action: A worked example
- 5. Empirical evaluation
- 5.1 The affect of stereotypes and properties
- 5.2 Placing an affective spin on stereotypes
- 5.3 Representational adequacy of metaphors
- 5.4 Human judgment
- 6. Metaphor as a resource and a public Web service
- 7. Conclusions : Explaining the world with deliberate metaphors
- References
- 4. VisMet and the crowd
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Theoretical background
- 2.1 Tags as traces of human behavior
- 2.2 Visual metaphor comprehension and interpretation
- 3. Method
- 3.1 Crowdsourcing tags
- 3.2 Classifying tags
- 4. Analysis
- 4.1 Crowdsourcing tags
- 4.2 Classifying tags
- 5. Discussion
- 6. Conclusions
- References
- 5. MetaNet.HR
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Theoretical background
- 2.1 Neural theory of language and thought
- 2.2 Neural theory of metaphor
- 3. Main tasks of the MetaNet.HR project
- 3.1 (Cognitive) linguistic tasks
- 3.1.1 Metaphor families
- 3.1.2 Creating a list of target words
- 3.1.3 Linguistic metaphor identification and annotation
- 3.1.4 Conceptual metaphor identification
- 3.1.5 Data entry
- 3.2 Computational tasks
- 3.3 Cognitive-psychological tasks
- 3.1 (Cognitive) linguistic tasks
- 4. Results
- 5. Risks and challenges
- 6. Conclusions and future outlook
- Acknowledgements
- References
- 6. The lexical vs. corpus-based method in the study of metaphors
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Describing the lexical approach
- 3. Surprise in the lexical approach
- 3.1 Lexical structure
- 3.2 Metaphors of surprise in the lexical approach
- 3.3 Metonymies of surprise in the lexical approach
- 4. Surprise in a corpus-based approach
- 4.1 Metaphors of surprise – a corpus-based approach
- 4.2 Metonymies of surprise – a corpus-based approach
- 5. Challenges of the two approaches
- 6. Discussion
- 6.1 Number of metaphors
- 6.2 Conventionalization
- 6.3 Types and tokens
- 6.4 Presence of target term
- 6.5 Synonyms
- 6.6 Polysemy
- 7. Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Sources
- 7. Figurative reasoning in hedged performatives
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Illocutionary force preserving hedged performatives
- 2.1 Single hedges
- 2.1.1 Modal hedges
- 2.1.2 Propositional attitude hedges
- 2.1.3 Emotive hedges
- 2.1.4 Entailment vs. metonymic inference
- 2.2 Double hedging
- 2.2.1 Emotive predicate plus modal
- 2.2.2 Mood plus modal
- 2.2.3 Conditional plus modal
- 2.1 Single hedges
- 3. Illocutionary force canceling hedges
- 4. The metonymic potential of can and must
- 4.1 The metonymic potential of can in assertive speech acts
- 4.2 The metonymic potential of must in assertive speech acts
- 4.2.1 Negatively evaluated and experienced obligations
- 4.2.2 Happily performed obligations
- 4.3 The metonymic potential of can in commissive speech acts
- 4.4 The metonymic potential of must and can in directive speech acts
- 5. Conclusion and outlook
- References
- 8. Mereology in the flesh
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Towards a sharper definition of the part–whole relation
- 2.1 Partonomy is not meronymy
- 2.2 Partonomy is not taxonomy
- Taxonomy test
- Partonomy test
- 2.3 Partonomy is not possession
- 2.4 Partonomy is not containment
- 2.5 Partonomy is not contiguity
- 3. Two different kinds of whole
- 4. The embodied origin of part–whole relations
- 5. Summary and conclusion
- References
- 9. Metaphor repositories and cross-linguistic comparison
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Case studies
- 2.1 Metaphors in medical discourse
- 2.2 Time metaphors: Moving time vs. moving ego
- 3. Towards a larger picture
- 3.1 An ontology model of lexical concepts and constructions
- 3.2 Emergent hierarchy of concepts
- 3.3 The structure of the emergent ontology model
- 3.4 Classifying concepts and creating mereological relations in OMLCC
- 3.5 Modelling lexical concepts and words
- 3.6 Identifying metaphorical constructions
- 4. Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Notes on contributors
- Metonymy and metaphor index
- Author index
- Subject index
Usage statistics
Access count: 0
Last 30 days: 0 Detailed usage statistics |